57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
2
4
3
5
3
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
12.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
23
111
34
63
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich