57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
28
4
4
3
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.3
3.3
12.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
67
40
111
36

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich