57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
14
6
4
5
3
Optimale Position
#9
#8
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
13.4
4.7
3.3
2.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
153
146
40
63
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen