Vergleich: Uniroyal MS plus 77 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Obere-Mittelklasse

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Hankook

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

MS plus 77

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

Anzahl der Tests

19

1

5

23

Optimale Position

#3

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

11.2

1.0

2.2

3.3

Neuester Test

2021

2025

Verfügbare Größen

76

64

63

176

Nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Nassbremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - quer

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Aquaplaning - längs

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Handling - nass

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schnee

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Schneetraktion

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schnee Handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Schnee Slalom

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Kosten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rollwiderstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometerstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Preis-Wert

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Komfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Außengeräusch

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Komfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Innengeräusche

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Trocken

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Handling - trocken

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Trockenbremsen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Eis

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Uniroyal MS plus 77 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

MS plus 77

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Eis

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen