57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Uniroyal MS plus 77 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
19
3
3
23
26
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.2
3.3
3.7
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
76
40
34
176
66

Nass

Nass
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Handling - nass
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%

Schnee

Schnee
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Schnee Handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Schneetraktion
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Schnee Slalom
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rollwiderstand
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Preis-Wert
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Komfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Innengeräusche
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Trocken

Trocken
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Eis

Eis
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich