57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Tomket Sport gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Tomket
Sport
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
6
3
4
Optimale Position
#16
#1
#3
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
34.0
6.1
12.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
13
47
111
146
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Tomket Sport
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Tomket Sport
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Tomket Sport
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Tomket Sport
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Tomket Sport
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Tomket Sport
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Tomket Sport
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Tomket Sport
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Tomket Sport
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Tomket Sport
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Tomket Sport
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Tomket Sport
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Tomket Sport
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Tomket Sport
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Tomket Sport
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen