Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Speed-Life 3

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

14

10

4

3

Optimale Position

#2

#3

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

18.1

6.0

12.0

3.3

Neuester Test

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

116

104

111

40

Nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - längs

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Handling - nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kreisbahn nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Nassleistung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Innengeräusche

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Handling - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Trockenleistung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Kosten

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Rollwiderstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Speed-Life 3

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen