Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

Anzahl der Tests

14

3

10

4

6

Optimale Position

#2

#3

Durchschnittliche Position

18.1

3.3

6.0

12.0

4.7

Neuester Test

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

116

40

104

111

146

Nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Nassbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - längs

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Handling - nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Kreisbahn nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Nassleistung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

70%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Außengeräusch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Innengeräusche

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Trockenbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Handling - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Trockenleistung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

58%

Kosten

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Kilometerstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Rollwiderstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen