Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

14

3

10

3

Optimale Position

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

18.1

3.3

6.0

3.7

Neuester Test

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

116

40

104

34

Nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Nassbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Handling - nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kreisbahn nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Nassleistung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Innengeräusche

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Handling - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Trockenleistung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Kosten

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kilometerstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rollwiderstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen