Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

14

3

21

13

3

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

18.1

3.3

11.9

4.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2026

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

116

40

164

123

34

Nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Nassbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Handling - nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kreisbahn nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Seitenführung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

70%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Handling - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Innengeräusche

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kilometerstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Rollwiderstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Preis-Wert

Semperit Speed-Life 3

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

51%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen