Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Semperit

Speed-Life 3

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Speed-Life 3

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

14

21

3

13

3

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

18.1

11.9

3.7

4.3

3.3

Neuester Test

2026

2024

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

116

164

34

123

40

Nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Handling - nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - längs

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kreisbahn nass

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Seitenführung

Semperit Speed-Life 3

88%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Michelin Primacy 4+

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Handling - trocken

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Innengeräusche

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Komfort

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kosten

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Semperit Speed-Life 3

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Rollwiderstand

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Preis-Wert

Semperit Speed-Life 3

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin Primacy 4+

51%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Speed-Life 3

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen