58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Sava Eskimo HP2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Sava
Eskimo HP2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
15
4
18
4
4
3
Optimale Position
#6
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
15.5
12.0
6.1
3.3
3.8
1.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
28
111
47
40
36
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Nassbremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Handling - nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Rollwiderstand
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Eis
Vertrauensniveau
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.