Vergleich: Riken Road Performance gegen Gt Radial Fe2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Riken

Road Performance

R15 – R16

VS

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8

R14 – R20

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Turanza T005

Testprofil

Road Performance

Radial Fe2

Efficient Grip Performance

Anzahl der Tests

—

16

Optimale Position

—

#3

Durchschnittliche Position

—

5.5

Neuester Test

—

2023

Verfügbare Größen

—

153

Nass

Riken Road Performance

70%

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Nassbremsen

Riken Road Performance

63%

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Aquaplaning - quer

Riken Road Performance

76%

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Aquaplaning - längs

Riken Road Performance

74%

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Komfort

Riken Road Performance

74%

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Außengeräusch

Riken Road Performance

74%

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Trocken

Riken Road Performance

74%

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Trockenbremsen

Riken Road Performance

74%

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Kosten

Riken Road Performance

67%

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Kilometerstand

Riken Road Performance

67%

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Riken Road Performance gegen Gt Radial Fe2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Road Performance

Radial Fe2

Efficient Grip Performance

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen