57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Riken Road Performance gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Riken
Road Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Anzahl der Tests
—
21
18
13
Optimale Position
—
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
—
11.9
6.1
4.3
Neuester Test
—
2024
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
—
165
47
123

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Riken Road Performance
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Nassbremsen
Riken Road Performance
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Riken Road Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Trocken
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Trockenbremsen
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kilometerstand
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Komfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Außengeräusch
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
ADACADAC
Sommer
2023205/55 R16Ansehen

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen