Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Budget

Semperit

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

P ZERO

Speed-Life 3

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

17

14

10

3

Optimale Position

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

6.1

18.1

6.0

3.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2020

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

330

116

104

40

34

Nass

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Handling - nass

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - quer

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kreisbahn nass

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Nassleistung

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Trockenleistung

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Innengeräusche

Pirelli P ZERO

69%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

P ZERO

Speed-Life 3

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen