Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

P ZERO

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Anzahl der Tests

17

14

3

1

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

6.1

5.6

3.3

3.7

1.0

Neuester Test

2020

2023

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

330

47

40

34

64

Nass

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Nokian WetProof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - längs

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Handling - nass

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - quer

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Nokian WetProof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Nassbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Nokian WetProof

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kreisbahn nass

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Nokian WetProof

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seitenführung

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

Nokian WetProof

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Nokian WetProof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trockenbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Handling - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Nokian WetProof

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Nokian WetProof

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Nokian WetProof

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rollwiderstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Nokian WetProof

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Nokian WetProof

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Nokian WetProof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Außengeräusch

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

P ZERO

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen