Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

SportContact 7

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

17

3

4

15

3

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#3

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

6.1

3.3

12.0

1.2

3.7

Neuester Test

2020

2026

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

330

40

111

122

34

Nass

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Handling - nass

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - quer

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Nassbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Seitenführung

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental SportContact 7

70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

SportContact 7

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen