Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Anzahl der Tests

17

3

14

10

6

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#8

#2

#3

Durchschnittliche Position

6.1

3.3

13.4

6.0

4.7

Neuester Test

2020

2026

Verfügbare Größen

330

40

153

104

146

Nass

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Nassbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Handling - nass

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - quer

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Kreisbahn nass

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Nassleistung

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

70%

Trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Trockenbremsen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Handling - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

Trockenleistung

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

58%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rollwiderstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Kilometerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Außengeräusch

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Komfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Pirelli P ZERO gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen