56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Nokian
WR C3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
3
1
Optimale Position
#7
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
5.5
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
23
153
34
64

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich