57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
WR C3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
3
4
3
5
3
Optimale Position
#7
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
6.1
3.3
12.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
23
47
40
111
34
63
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Nokian WR C3
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich