57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
WetProof
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
16
4
1
4
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.6
5.5
12.0
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2023
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
111
66
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian WetProof
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WetProof
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WetProof
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WetProof
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Nokian WetProof
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WetProof
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Nokian WetProof
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Nokian WetProof
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Nokian WetProof
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WetProof
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WetProof
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Nokian WetProof
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich