Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Anzahl der Tests

14

16

3

1

Optimale Position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

5.6

5.5

3.7

1.0

Neuester Test

2023

2025

Verfügbare Größen

47

153

34

64

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian WetProof

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen