57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Nokian
WetProof
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
14
18
21
4
5
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.6
6.1
11.9
3.3
4.8
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
47
165
40
158

Nass

Nass
Nokian WetProof
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WetProof
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WetProof
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WetProof
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Nokian WetProof
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WetProof
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
Nokian WetProof
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WetProof
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WetProof
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Nokian WetProof
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Preis-Wert
Nokian WetProof
46%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich