56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nokian WetProofObere-Mittelklasse
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
21
10
3
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.6
11.9
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
164
104
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Handling - nass
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Seitenführung
Nokian WetProof
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Nassleistung
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trockenleistung
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WetProof
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Nokian WetProof
46%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich