Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

WetProof

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Anzahl der Tests

14

21

3

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

5.6

11.9

3.3

4.7

Neuester Test

2023

2024

2026

Verfügbare Größen

47

164

40

126

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Nassleistung

Nokian WetProof

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

79%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Nokian WetProof

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Trockenleistung

Nokian WetProof

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Michelin Primacy 5

88%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Nokian WetProof

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

WetProof

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen