56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Nokian WetProofObere-Mittelklasse
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
1 gemeinsame Tests mit detaillierten Daten
Auch vergleichen mit
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
14
21
18
14
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#1
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
5.6
11.9
6.1
13.4
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
164
47
153

Leistungsvergleich

Nassleistung
Nokian WetProof
70%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
62%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nassbremsen
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Handling - nass
Nokian WetProof
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
51%
Aquaplaning längs
Nokian WetProof
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Aquaplaning quer
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Trockenleistung
Nokian WetProof
76%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WetProof
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WetProof
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
92%
Komfort und Lärm
Nokian WetProof
73%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Außengeräusch
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Fahrkomfort
Nokian WetProof
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
73%
Wirtschaft
Nokian WetProof
55%
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone Roadhawk
55%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Kilometerstand
Nokian WetProof
38%
Firestone Roadhawk
46%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Im Vergleich verwendete Tests

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
AutobildAutobild
Sommer
2021205/55 R16Ansehen

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Allgemeinen Vergleich anzeigen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich