Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

WetProof

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Anzahl der Tests

14

3

18

1

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

5.6

3.7

6.1

1.0

Neuester Test

2023

2025

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

47

34

47

64

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Nokian WetProof

63%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

WetProof

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen