Vergleich: Nokian Wetproof SUV gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

Wetproof SUV

R16 – R19

VS

Premium

Michelin

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Wetproof SUV

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

3

4

5

3

Optimale Position

#5

#3

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

5.3

12.0

2.2

3.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2022

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

27

111

63

40

34

Offroad

Nokian Wetproof SUV

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Traktion Gras

Nokian Wetproof SUV

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Traktion Kies

Nokian Wetproof SUV

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Nass

Nokian Wetproof SUV

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian Wetproof SUV

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Handling - nass

Nokian Wetproof SUV

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian Wetproof SUV

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian Wetproof SUV

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Trocken

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Nokian Wetproof SUV

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Komfort

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Nokian Wetproof SUV

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian Wetproof SUV

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian Wetproof SUV gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Wetproof SUV

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Offroad

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen