57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
4
1
3
4
Optimale Position
#6
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
12.0
1.0
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
91
111
66
36
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich