57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
3
4
18
6
4
3
Optimale Position
#6
#3
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
12.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
91
111
47
146
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen