57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
4
28
4
4
Optimale Position
#6
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
12.0
2.3
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
91
111
67
40
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich