57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
2
4
5
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
6.1
2.0
3.3
4.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
91
47
48
40
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen