57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
49
24
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
6.1
3.2
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
91
47
213
302

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen