57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
14
3
4
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
6.1
3.6
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
91
47
194
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen