57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Line
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
5
4
18
4
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
2.8
12.0
6.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
53
139
111
47
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Nokian Line
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Line
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kosten
Nokian Line
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Nokian Line
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Nokian Line
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen