57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
4
1
18
6
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
3.3
1.0
6.1
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
53
40
27
47
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Trocken
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Kosten
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Komfort
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Nokian Line
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen