57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate

Testprofil

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Anzahl der Tests
6
4
1
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
53
40
27

Nass

Nass
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich