57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
6
4
18
13
1
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
3.3
6.1
4.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
53
40
47
123
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Line
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Kosten
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Komfort
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Nokian Line
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Komfort
Nokian Line
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen