57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Line
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
14
6
Optimale Position
#6
#8
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
13.4
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
53
153
146

Nass

Nass
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Line
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Line
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Preis-Wert
Nokian Line
30%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Line
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Nokian Line
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich