57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian cLine VAN gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Nokian
cLine VAN
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
5
4
Optimale Position
#4
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
4.0
3.3
2.8
12.0
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
16
40
139
111

Nass

Nass
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
Nokian cLine VAN
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian cLine VAN
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian cLine VAN
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Handling - nass
Nokian cLine VAN
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian cLine VAN
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian cLine VAN
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian cLine VAN
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Nokian cLine VAN
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian cLine VAN
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich