57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Nokian cLine VAN gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nokian cLine VANObere-Mittelklasse
NokianNokian

cLine VAN

R14 – R17
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Nokian
cLine VAN
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
4
Optimale Position
#4
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.0
13.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
16
153
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian cLine VAN
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian cLine VAN
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Nokian cLine VAN
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian cLine VAN
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Nokian cLine VAN
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian cLine VAN
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Nokian cLine VAN
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian cLine VAN
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Nokian cLine VAN
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Nokian cLine VAN
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian cLine VAN
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Nokian cLine VAN
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Nokian cLine VAN vs Falken Linam VAN01Nokian cLine VAN vs Kumho PorTran KC53Nokian cLine VAN vs Uniroyal RainMax 3 VANNokian cLine VAN vs Kleber TransproBFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich