58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas MC50 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Mitas
MC50
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
7
30
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
4.4
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
11
40
47
158
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas MC50 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Continental PremiumContact 7 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.