58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
18
7
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
6.1
4.4
3.8
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
165
40
47
158
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
33%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
74%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Roadhawk GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.