58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
18
4
5
4
30
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.3
6.1
3.8
2.2
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
60
123
47
36
63
40
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Multihawk 2 Michelin Primacy 4+ Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Continental PremiumContact 7 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.