57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
4
3
28
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
4.8
6.1
3.3
12.0
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
158
47
40
111
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen