57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 4 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 4
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
20
6
1
5
4
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.5
4.7
1.0
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2022
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
386
146
66
63
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Offroad
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Traktion Gras
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Traktion Kies
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen