56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 4 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Michelin Primacy 4Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4

R14 – R23
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
20
14
10
3
Optimale Position
#1
#8
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.5
13.4
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2022
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
384
153
104
40

Nass

Nass
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Seitenführung
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Nassleistung
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Trockenleistung
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Offroad

Offroad
Michelin Primacy 4
78%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich