57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
4
1
6
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
4.3
2.2
3.3
1.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
123
63
40
66
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Michelin Primacy 4+
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen