57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
3
14
4
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.3
2.2
3.7
3.6
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
123
63
36
194
40
40

Nass

Nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich