57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
13
18
5
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
4.3
6.1
2.8
3.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
123
47
139
40
36
63

Nass

Nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich